Go Back   GTAGaming Forums > Grand Theft Auto > Grand Theft Auto IV
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-18-2007   #1
Schism
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 313
Schism is an unknown quantity at this point
The Anti-Wish-List List

My wish for GTAIV goes against everyone else's wish so far.
Everyone wants bigger and better.
But the bigger things get, the more chances the collapse under their own weight.
So much emphasis on quantity, not enough on quality.
I want to see GTAIV as more of a simplified approach to the series.
And improvement, but a new beginning.
One good city - large enough to give a lot of free roam, but not too large as to have too many unusuable vague spots.
A good, condensed, interactive city, rather than acres and acres of generic land with un-enterable buildings.
It's quality we want.
Quality of story, design, and implimentation.
Quantity should only be considered AFTER you have the quality part down straight.

*steps off soap box*

*throws two cents into can*
__________________


Schism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007   #2
GTA Mike
Eh?
 
GTA Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,300
GTA Mike is a splendid one to beholdGTA Mike is a splendid one to beholdGTA Mike is a splendid one to beholdGTA Mike is a splendid one to beholdGTA Mike is a splendid one to beholdGTA Mike is a splendid one to beholdGTA Mike is a splendid one to beholdGTA Mike is a splendid one to beholdGTA Mike is a splendid one to beholdGTA Mike is a splendid one to beholdGTA Mike is a splendid one to behold
I agree I want a lot of detail in the game, and I think with the next generation they can handle making a very large area and still keep it detailed and interesting
__________________
GTA Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007   #3
Thundercracker
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,838
Thundercracker has a reputation beyond reputeThundercracker has a reputation beyond reputeThundercracker has a reputation beyond reputeThundercracker has a reputation beyond reputeThundercracker has a reputation beyond reputeThundercracker has a reputation beyond reputeThundercracker has a reputation beyond reputeThundercracker has a reputation beyond reputeThundercracker has a reputation beyond reputeThundercracker has a reputation beyond reputeThundercracker has a reputation beyond repute
That's why San Andreas sucked. They gave only a handful of improvements and spanned them out over a large space, adding stupid rural areas to increase play time by making you drive forever to get from place to place.
Thundercracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007   #4
T-Virus
Obscured By Clouds
 
T-Virus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,403
T-Virus has a spectacular aura aboutT-Virus has a spectacular aura aboutT-Virus has a spectacular aura aboutT-Virus has a spectacular aura aboutT-Virus has a spectacular aura aboutT-Virus has a spectacular aura aboutT-Virus has a spectacular aura aboutT-Virus has a spectacular aura aboutT-Virus has a spectacular aura aboutT-Virus has a spectacular aura aboutT-Virus has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Olin
That's why San Andreas sucked. They gave only a handful of improvements and spanned them out over a large space, adding stupid rural areas to increase play time by making you drive forever to get from place to place.
Excactly!

Although I enjoyed SA a lot, this is where the problem lies.

I myself would also rather see 1 large city with some countryside, if it helps R* focusing on details rather the size.
T-Virus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007   #5
Clayton
BINGO BANGO BONGO
 
Clayton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ohio.
Posts: 2,659
Clayton has a brilliant futureClayton has a brilliant futureClayton has a brilliant futureClayton has a brilliant futureClayton has a brilliant futureClayton has a brilliant futureClayton has a brilliant futureClayton has a brilliant futureClayton has a brilliant futureClayton has a brilliant futureClayton has a brilliant future
I definately agree with Slim, I don't want another gangsta GTA. It pretty much had to be done once, but...just no.

And I personally disagree, I loved the enormous countryside, but maybe that's just me.
__________________


...Just what I've always wanted, a four-wheeled coffin to call home.
Clayton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007   #6
Slim Trashman
Sanitation Division
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 12,224
Slim Trashman has a brilliant futureSlim Trashman has a brilliant futureSlim Trashman has a brilliant futureSlim Trashman has a brilliant futureSlim Trashman has a brilliant futureSlim Trashman has a brilliant futureSlim Trashman has a brilliant futureSlim Trashman has a brilliant futureSlim Trashman has a brilliant futureSlim Trashman has a brilliant futureSlim Trashman has a brilliant future
Only thing I could say I really don't want is another gangster themed GTA.

Edit: I also would not prefer the game to take place outside the USA or any time but modern day.
__________________

Last edited by Slim Trashman; 03-18-2007 at 07:15 PM..
Slim Trashman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007   #7
swallowed
Registered User
 
swallowed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Newfoundland
Posts: 1,218
swallowed is just really niceswallowed is just really niceswallowed is just really niceswallowed is just really niceswallowed is just really niceswallowed is just really niceswallowed is just really niceswallowed is just really niceswallowed is just really niceswallowed is just really niceswallowed is just really nice
The countryside was okay imo, I didn't like to drive the long distances like Olin said like in that mission "Photo Opprotunity" it took too long to drive to where you were supposed to go. I guess it would be better if there was more life in the countryside and that would keep me occupied for awhile.
swallowed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007   #8
Thundercracker
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,838
Thundercracker has a reputation beyond reputeThundercracker has a reputation beyond reputeThundercracker has a reputation beyond reputeThundercracker has a reputation beyond reputeThundercracker has a reputation beyond reputeThundercracker has a reputation beyond reputeThundercracker has a reputation beyond reputeThundercracker has a reputation beyond reputeThundercracker has a reputation beyond reputeThundercracker has a reputation beyond reputeThundercracker has a reputation beyond repute
The countryside made me angry and frustrated. I knew it like the back of my hand, I just still had to navigate through it. It was pretty boring as well.
Thundercracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007   #9
Jimmy_86
Think!
 
Jimmy_86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Auckland
Posts: 2,802
Jimmy_86 has much to be proud ofJimmy_86 has much to be proud ofJimmy_86 has much to be proud ofJimmy_86 has much to be proud ofJimmy_86 has much to be proud ofJimmy_86 has much to be proud ofJimmy_86 has much to be proud ofJimmy_86 has much to be proud ofJimmy_86 has much to be proud ofJimmy_86 has much to be proud ofJimmy_86 has much to be proud of
Although I agree that too big would be dull and possibly repetative (just look at LA in TC:SoLA), I thought SA was reasonable. It only takes 2-3 minutes for most long journeys. Gives you a chance to listen to the radio, which I love doing.

If you look at VC and compare it's amount of gameplay to the map size, then do the same for SA, the ratio is quite different. I don't know exact numbers but from experience the SA map is about 4-6 times bigger than VC but the game a bit under twice as long, meaning less game per square inch (if you will). If they keep the ratio closer to what is was for VC I would imagine this would help.
Jimmy_86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007   #10
X-reS
Looks better in real life.
 
X-reS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Motown
Posts: 2,918
X-reS is a splendid one to beholdX-reS is a splendid one to beholdX-reS is a splendid one to beholdX-reS is a splendid one to beholdX-reS is a splendid one to beholdX-reS is a splendid one to beholdX-reS is a splendid one to beholdX-reS is a splendid one to beholdX-reS is a splendid one to beholdX-reS is a splendid one to beholdX-reS is a splendid one to behold
I enjoyed the off roading in SA. If you don't like it you could always fly. That another reason it was good. The large space was good for flying over. It was fun to explore originally. I think their is just as much detail in SA as VC. VC always came off over rated to me. Other then the great storyline ,and the environment their wasn't much after that. Once you get past the fact that it was the 80s the environment would get really boring.
__________________
Even when our eyes are closed, there is a whole entire world out there that exist outside our dreams and ourselves.
X-reS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007   #11
Ian
Grand Theft Manual
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 84
Ian is an unknown quantity at this point
I'd probably like it if they included one huge city with obvious different areas (commerical, residential, industrial, etc) one countryside an a small town or two. Make it slightly bigger than in SA, but not too stretched out. I didn't like the multiple small towns.

Btw, I think it was pretty balanced in SA, plus when not in a mission you can go into the countries and pick on cops and go off-road car chasing - usually with hilarious results. But the area restriction has got to go, it's kinda odd that they set up total road blocks just so CJ can't pass.
Ian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007   #12
Schism
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 313
Schism is an unknown quantity at this point
Yeah, don't get me wrong, the outback areas in SA were okay.
I loved offroading and dirt-biking.
And a plane would be useless if you only have a small city to fly over in one short trip.
I just don't want them to go too far with that.
Like I said, quality over quantity.
__________________


Schism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007   #13
Xeroer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia.
Posts: 2,873
Xeroer is on a distinguished roadXeroer is on a distinguished roadXeroer is on a distinguished roadXeroer is on a distinguished road
San Andreas rocked.
You all sucked!

I actually like SanAn better than the earlier games.. The size of it was to try something new.
I'm sure the new GTA won't be oversized and underused, though.
__________________
Once a new technology starts rolling, if you're not part of the steamroller, you're part of the road.
-Stewart Brand
Xeroer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007   #14
jammsbro
Autodrunk
 
jammsbro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 633
jammsbro will become famous soon enoughjammsbro will become famous soon enoughjammsbro will become famous soon enoughjammsbro will become famous soon enoughjammsbro will become famous soon enoughjammsbro will become famous soon enoughjammsbro will become famous soon enough
SA ROCKS like a MoFo

i agree.

its called grand theft auto so it should be about gansters and criminals anyway.

i just want the changing of clothes to be faster, buying and changing clothes takes aaaagees.
jammsbro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007   #15
Vampilehunter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
SA seemed more like an experiment to see how much they could pack into a ps2 GTA in order to see what would work or not on the ps3. I agree completely with the original poster. I'm sort of hoping that 4 is sort of a reworked Liberty City. I just liked the variety of terrain and atmosphere of that city the best.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:57 PM.