PDA

View Full Version : Do you think rockstar will.....


kent_paul
03-20-2007, 03:15 PM
Do you think rockstar try to past off a HOT COFFEE in GTA:IV? This site was on their favorite link list so May be they'll tell only their favorite sites.... But just a theory.:)

Slim Trashman
03-20-2007, 03:17 PM
I'd bet my life they wouldn't. I think the whole idea of sex in a video game is pretty low anyway.

Jazzy_Boy
03-20-2007, 03:20 PM
/close

Jazzy_Boy
03-20-2007, 03:21 PM
lmao your all so gay
but relle is gta 6 4 xbox or ps3

Slim Trashman
03-20-2007, 03:21 PM
Jazzy Boy, you really seem to be asking for a ban.

kent_paul
03-20-2007, 03:22 PM
When i have a kid; i would rather him whack of to Play boy than him learn to steal cars. But yes; sex in video games is also profanity so i agree with you.

mETAL hEAD
03-20-2007, 03:22 PM
i dont think they will put a hot coffee mod in GTA:IV

.:nemesis:.
03-20-2007, 03:23 PM
Jazzy Boy, you really seem to be asking for a ban.
True.dat and double posting.

swallowed
03-20-2007, 03:23 PM
I doubt it, Rockstar wouldn't want to get in a lot of trouble like that again

mETAL hEAD
03-20-2007, 03:23 PM
lmao your all so gay
but relle is gta 6 4 xbox or ps3

its for both XBOX 360 and ps3

Slim Trashman
03-20-2007, 03:24 PM
GTA IV is, he's asking about GTA 6..

.:nemesis:.
03-20-2007, 03:25 PM
I already closed two threads he made in GTA IV forum.

kent_paul
03-20-2007, 03:26 PM
Im just pitting a theroy on here for this MOD. Dont think im going to get a hard on for gta sex:smash: lol

P.S. JassyMan or what ever dont mess around on threads i almost got kicked off for my SIG being oversized. I respected that and stoped. Dont think they will hesitate to BAN you 4 that crap your pulling. And Buy the way Im not gay and neither are the rest. dont b stupid!!1

mETAL hEAD
03-20-2007, 03:30 PM
there is no GTA 6
GTAIII ,GTA:VC,GTA:SA = 3
GTA:IV = 4

Ash_735
03-20-2007, 03:30 PM
They decided they didn't want it in San Andreas during the alte stages, that's why they didn't have time to remove it. The whole girlfriend Idea in GTA is fucking reatarded anyway, this is GTA not The Sims, I wanna work for the mob, get in gun fights, fire from choppers, race to a destination, not try and beat a virtual girlfriend in a dance game so she will fuck the character!

kent_paul
03-20-2007, 03:38 PM
LMAO TRUE TRUE :laugh: Plus their would be STDs due to the reall life grapics.:evil3: :lick:
^
::
::
::
/\
/\
/\

Goat
03-20-2007, 03:57 PM
I think the whole idea of sex in a video game is pretty low anyway.

The whole girlfriend Idea in GTA is fucking reatarded anyway...

But the ability to kill indiscriminately is OK? Let's try and avoid the moral relativism, folks, because it's just not very convincing. Too funny. :laugh:

Sex, drugs, violence--I say include it all. Don't be shy. In for a penny, in for a pound.

DY
03-20-2007, 04:10 PM
Then it gets rated AO and most people on the forum won't be able to get it

Xan
03-20-2007, 04:17 PM
Too much of a risk, look at what people did to the San Andreas things. Also if i remember correctly anything hidden from the ESRB or how you spell those twats means an instant 1000$ or more penalty for every game sold with the hidden content in.

Goat
03-20-2007, 04:17 PM
I never said anything about ratings or sales. Obviously they have to make bank; it's a business, after all. Just saying that the sex=bad, killing=acceptable argument is just silly.

Olin
03-20-2007, 04:20 PM
Too much of a risk, look at what people did to the San Andreas things. Also if i remember correctly anything hidden from the ESRB or how you spell those twats means an instant 1000$ or more penalty for every game sold with the hidden content in.It wasn't even hidden content. The game's contents had to be strictly modified to get to it, which is what I thought was bullshit for Rockstar to get the blame on it.

.:nemesis:.
03-20-2007, 04:22 PM
The whole Hot Coffe thing was down to the nudity and visual act seen on screen, as it was ERSB passed with the camera staying outside and hearing their voices. :)

Xan
03-20-2007, 04:27 PM
It wasn't even hidden content. The game's contents had to be strictly modified to get to it, which is what I thought was bullshit for Rockstar to get the blame on it.

Yeah i say its bullshit too. PatrickW modified the code if i remember correctly and basically the whole san andreas thing just got fucked from there on. Also wasn't R* fault if some 10 yr old downloads the mod so he can watch animated pixels have sex and jack his ramrod.

DiscoBombs
03-20-2007, 04:32 PM
Why would you even want it in the game? Oh yeah, the people that do could never actually get laid.

Goat
03-20-2007, 04:45 PM
Why would you even want it in the game? Oh yeah, the people that do could never actually get laid.

By that logic there are lots of potential serial killers, base jumpers and pizza delivery guys out there also. :D

Ash_735
03-20-2007, 05:15 PM
I never said anything about ratings or sales. Obviously they have to make bank; it's a business, after all. Just saying that the sex=bad, killing=acceptable argument is just silly.

Sex isn't bad, I love Sex, look forward to doing it someday, but having Sex/Dating Sim in a game where you Kill people, work for mobsters (or ghetto friends in SA), steal cars and blow up stuff seems kind of odd and pointless. It's like putting a Pool Table mini-game in Metal Gear Solid!

DiscoBombs
03-20-2007, 05:44 PM
By that logic there are lots of potential serial killers, base jumpers and pizza delivery guys out there also. :D
The point I was trying to make is that having a sex minigame is pointless and stupid. If you want to see sex that bad download some porn, and if you want it that bad call an escort service or your girlfriend/boyfriend.

Roxstein
03-20-2007, 05:57 PM
And Buy the way Im not gay and neither are the rest.

I am! Well... sort of.

Anyway, I don't think so, unless they just go the Postal2 route and throw everything they can in. But because GTA is more popular, it'll have a hard time selling with content like that, due to instant AO ratings and being banned from many countries.

Xeroer
03-20-2007, 06:17 PM
I am! Well... sort of.

"I play SecondLife, therefore I am."

On topic, Rockstar aren't stupid.
End of discussion.

CaliMex
03-20-2007, 06:33 PM
I don't see sex as an odd part of GTA since the games have always had prostitutes that you can pick up and pay them for sex. It went further than having sex with a prostitute by showing you what they are doing but the minigame was just stupid and boring. It doesn't really give someone a reason to come back and "do it" again. I would rather much do a race or play pool than have polygon sex because you can earn some money there.

Rockstar just made a stupid move by not removing in the first place rather than disable it for now and be forced to remove it anyway for a second edition of the game. I think they could have forseen the possibility of someone creating a mod to allow access to the game and then seeing some kind of outrage when it's existence was leaked out. Many people talk about GTA a lot but not just by it's fans but by anti-gaming jerks who did find out about the minigame.

I might as well add my thought on the girlfriend feature, the stoyline shouldn't have forced you to have 2 girlfriends and it should have been some little unknown extra like the prostitute thing that isn't necessary to do. I don't really pick up prostitutes but have done so out of curiosity and I would do the same thing with a girlfriend but I would later forget about it. I think it adds to the realism to the game because sex, drugs and money do make the world go 'round and 'round.

Xeroer
03-20-2007, 07:32 PM
Probably a best thing we keep this whole hot-coffee stuff to a minimal, guys.

Olin
03-20-2007, 07:36 PM
For what reason?

.:nemesis:.
03-20-2007, 07:39 PM
It's all old news now anyway and i dont think R* will be stupid enough to give Jack Thompson a good reason for his lawsuit. ;)

billyboy_999
03-20-2007, 07:54 PM
If people really want it, modders will probably find some way to mod it into the game anyways even if it's not there

DiscoBombs
03-20-2007, 08:01 PM
If people really want it, modders will probably find some way to mod it into the game anyways even if it's not there
In that case it would require them to make new animations and do a bunch of recoding/retexturing.

Slim Trashman
03-20-2007, 08:10 PM
It's just not worth all the trouble to in anyway get it into the game. Even if it's just a third party mod, Rockstar could get blamed for allowing this sort of content into the game, which will result in an "un-moddable" version being released.

In the end, sex in Grand Theft Auto will have negative results, it's not worth it.

CaliMex
03-20-2007, 08:19 PM
It's just not worth all the trouble to in anyway get it into the game. Even if it's just a third party mod, Rockstar could get blamed for allowing this sort of content into the game, which will result in an "un-moddable" version being released.

In the end, sex in Grand Theft Auto will have negative results, it's not worth it.

I suppose you're right since there is a higher threshold for acceptable violence in media compared to how much nudity and sex is allowed. I doubt they will add such a minigame again mostly because of this fiasco. I too want to forget about hot coffee but I see something written about it once in a while.

Slim Trashman
03-20-2007, 11:08 PM
Man did you call that: Mentioned in this new GameSpot article (http://www.gamespot.com/news/6167771.html?action= convert&om_clk=latestnews&tag=latestnews;title;0)