PDA

View Full Version : Mike was in Vice City


Tangy
09-22-2004, 03:25 PM
I read somewhere that the main character in GTA advance is Mike. Well Mike was in Vice City for two of the missions. He was seen once in the mission copland, where lance is yelling at him - yes, that is mike.

he was also seen in the mission before that, where you gotta take out the dbp securities, hes one of ur guards. he might be in his 30s in advance, making him alittle older than previous gta characters you get to play as

Reptillia
09-22-2004, 09:34 PM
mike is a pretty common name.

Free Mike
09-22-2004, 09:36 PM
Originally posted by reptillia
mike is a pretty common name.

Yeah. *Looks at sig*

Mercury
09-23-2004, 03:28 AM
I believe it's him because the main characters in the GTA's are usually taken from something to do with another GTA, so he was and I remember that mission that was a easy mission also.

PaintedBlack
09-24-2004, 11:10 PM
Look at the GTA Advance screenshots. In the cut-scenes Mike looks about 25. Considering GTA:A takes place a year before GTA3 (i.e., the year 2000), he would have been about 11 in Vice City.

Tangy
09-25-2004, 07:15 AM
how do you know 3 takes place in 01? thats the year it came out but its not the exact year it takes place!

PaintedBlack
09-25-2004, 05:59 PM
What year would you suggest it takes place in? It doesn't even matter. Mike couldn't have possibly been the same Mike in Vice City.

Tangy
09-26-2004, 10:30 AM
...look it is OKAY if someone is in his 30s and still be in a gta playable character.

and everywhere im seeing this: first liberty city, then vice city, now san andreas. why isnt it first liberty city, then vice city, now Advance and San andreas? If evryone is waiting for san andreas? why is rockstar already gonna start making ANOTHer gta at the same time? its not fair!

that would mean advance should be also on the wait list NOT JUST san andreas. if there are two, then how come the gta official site doesnt even have grand theft auto advance on it?

PaintedBlack
09-27-2004, 10:34 PM
...look it is OKAY if someone is in his 30s and still be in a gta playable character.

I never said it wasn't. I said that even if Mike was in his 30's, he still wouldn't have been able to be the same Mike that was in Vice City.

why isnt it first liberty city, then vice city, now Advance and San andreas? If evryone is waiting for san andreas?

What do you mean why isn't it that way? It is.

why is rockstar already gonna start making ANOTHer gta at the same time? its not fair!

How is it "not fair"?

that would mean advance should be also on the wait list NOT JUST san andreas.

Why should GTA Advance be delayed any further if it's finished? It's been delayed for three years already.

if there are two, then how come the gta official site doesnt even have grand theft auto advance on it?

I suggest checking the site again. It's on there.

Tangy
09-28-2004, 02:52 PM
Originally posted by PaintedBlack
I never said it wasn't. I said that even if Mike was in his 30's, he still wouldn't have been able to be the same Mike that was in Vice City.



What do you mean why isn't it that way? It is.



How is it "not fair"?



Why should GTA Advance be delayed any further if it's finished? It's been delayed for three years already.



I suggest checking the site again. It's on there.

Nope. I checked the site. It isn't there.

Why would two Grand Theft Autos come out? Which one will be Grand Theft Auto 5 then? Advance or San Andreas?

IF Advance is a brand new story, it should come out for PS2 and Xbox.

What I mean is Why isnt it First Liberty City, then Vice City, now Advance? GTA Advance is coming out a day earlier anyway.

And if Mike was in his 30s in Advance, why wouldn't he be the same in Vice?

PaintedBlack
09-28-2004, 04:47 PM
Nope. I checked the site. It isn't there.

http://www.rockstargames.com/grandtheftauto/gba/

Bam. There you go.

Why would two Grand Theft Autos come out?

Maybe you haven't been a gamer for very long, but dual releases of games aren't unheard of. The most recent example I can think of is Metroid Prime for GameCube and Metroid Fusion for GBA, which were released simultaneously.

Which one will be Grand Theft Auto 5 then? Advance or San Andreas?

Neither is GTA5, just how Vice City wasn't GTA4. They're their own games.

IF Advance is a brand new story, it should come out for PS2 and Xbox.

I think I'll let Rockstar determine where their games "should" be released, thank you.

What I mean is Why isnt it First Liberty City, then Vice City, now Advance?

I still have no idea what the hell you mean. You keep asking why it isn't that way, when that's exactly how it is.

GTA Advance is coming out a day earlier anyway.

And?

And if Mike was in his 30s in Advance, why wouldn't he be the same in Vice?

I'm not going to argue this any more, since you're never going to let it go. Just trust me, GTA:A Mike is not GTA:VC Mike.

Tangy
09-29-2004, 03:14 PM
Originally posted by PaintedBlack
http://www.rockstargames.com/grandtheftauto/gba/

Bam. There you go.

It isnt on the Grand Theft Auto site.It's separate.


Maybe you haven't been a gamer for very long, but dual releases of games aren't unheard of. The most recent example I can think of is Metroid Prime for GameCube and Metroid Fusion for GBA, which were released simultaneously.
then which one is more anticipated? Advance or san andreas?



Neither is GTA5, just how Vice City wasn't GTA4. They're their own games.
GTA VC is another 3, i think thats how it is


I think I'll let Rockstar determine where their games "should" be released, thank you.

uhh gta 1 london & 2 came out for gba color, gta 2 for dreamcast, gta3 and vc for xbox, and all for ps2 and pc, so why wouldnt advance come out for any other?







And?
and what?



I'm not going to argue this any more, since you're never going to let it go. Just trust me, GTA:A Mike is not GTA:VC Mike. I still have no idea what the hell you mean. You keep asking why it isn't that way, when that's exactly how it is.

I will believe he is the same. No matter what.

PaintedBlack
09-29-2004, 04:53 PM
It isnt on the Grand Theft Auto site.It's separate.

Good freakin' lord. The point is, it's on Rockstar's site, it's an official GTA game, and it's officially being released.

then which one is more anticipated? Advance or san andreas?

What the hell is the point here? You're basically telling me that Advance should be delayed simply because more people are going to buy San Andreas.

GTA VC is another 3, i think thats how it is

You asked me which game was going to be GTA5. Advance or San Andreas. If you ask me a question like that, it means you're assuming Vice City was 4, which it isn't. So now you're saying it's not 4. Make up your mind.

uhh gta 1 london & 2 came out for gba color, gta 2 for dreamcast, gta3 and vc for xbox, and all for ps2 and pc, so why wouldnt advance come out for any other?

First off, London did not come out for GameBoy Color. Second, all you've been doing is complaining about the fact that there's a new GTA coming out for a system other than PS2. Why is that such a huge deal? There's no videogame rulebook stating that every new GTA game must be released for a Sony console.

Tangy
09-30-2004, 02:38 PM
Originally posted by PaintedBlack
Good freakin' lord. The point is, it's on Rockstar's site, it's an official GTA game, and it's officially being released.



What the hell is the point here? You're basically telling me that Advance should be delayed simply because more people are going to buy San Andreas.



You asked me which game was going to be GTA5. Advance or San Andreas. If you ask me a question like that, it means you're assuming Vice City was 4, which it isn't. So now you're saying it's not 4. Make up your mind.



First off, London did not come out for GameBoy Color. Second, all you've been doing is complaining about the fact that there's a new GTA coming out for a system other than PS2. Why is that such a huge deal? There's no videogame rulebook stating that every new GTA game must be released for a Sony console.

dude im not mad that its comin out for the gbasp im just mad that its coming out at the same time as sa


...no im not. youve obviously misunderstood me


gta, gtalondon, gta2, gta3, vc, a, sa. pretty much everybody is saying to me vc is 4 and ive gotten sick of tellin ppl it isnt but hey who would listen to me so ive gone with them


so what if one gta did not come out for gbc? the point is, gtaa osnt the first gta to hit gba. it has happened before. can we try to stop arguing? im trying to feel better about this.

PaintedBlack
09-30-2004, 05:26 PM
dude im not mad that its comin out for the gbasp im just mad that its coming out at the same time as sa

Once again, why is it so horrible to have two games released at the same time? One will still be around after you buy the other.

...no im not. youve obviously misunderstood me

You JUST TOLD ME you're mad GTA Advance is coming out at the same time as San Andreas, and now you're telling me I misunderstood you when I asked if you wanted Advance to be delayed. If you don't want them coming out at the same time, what else do you suggest?

leon101
09-30-2004, 07:21 PM
sorry, but it is a completely different mike, and i have heard people say that mike in gta advance kinda looks like the character in gta 3. :D

Tangy
10-03-2004, 12:07 PM
Actually you guys are right. It is a different Mike.

There is a third Mike in Grand Theft Auto 3 if you remember. The first mission for Joey Le1 is 'Mike Lips Last Lunch.'

So there are 3 different Mikes. I'm sorry for making this stupid argument.